Show Posts - Bruce Hughes

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Bruce Hughes

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 14
16
Hangar Flying / Re: n82cd long ez project
« on: January 28, 2011, 08:20:43 PM »
Waldo, you mixed up 2 airplanes.   The "change the engine mount" work (that I did) was on N199BH, not
the airplane without mount, engine, or nose.

My GUESS is that someone was in the middle of making some mods, took off the engine mount,
cowling and engine, cut off the nose to lengthen it (anticipating a CG problem) and then had
to quit (lost medical?).

Bruce Hughes    :)


17
Hangar Flying / Re: n82cd long ez project
« on: January 28, 2011, 03:45:21 PM »
Hi Whoever you are:

I had to cut off one fuel sump because I was changing engine mounts.
(The original mount was much too flimsy IMHO).   A pair of bolts holding
the aluminum extrusions to the lower longerons can only be reached
by removing the sumps.   Another GOTCHA on building.   Luckily you can
buy the fuel sumps already formed from the guys in N. California (I
forgot the company name).  (Featherlite?)

Bruce Hughes   :)

18
Hangar Flying / Re: Manifold Pressure line for EIS, O-235
« on: January 26, 2011, 08:21:33 PM »
OK but you should ask an engine guy; I think you have 2 ports per cylinder.
The O320E2A does.

Bruce Hughes    :)

19
Hangar Flying / Re: Manifold Pressure line for EIS, O-235
« on: January 25, 2011, 05:07:26 AM »
Hi.   1 port per cylinder will do because you do not have to prime all
4 cylinders.   I think you will find 2 per cylinder.   Look very carefully
at the cylinders all around the end of the cylinder near the spark plug,
and valves.   There will be threaded plugs in the ports.

I am away from home just now or I could look in my owner's manual.
Also, the owner's manual may not show it; a rebuild manual is more
complete.

Bruce   :)

20
Hangar Flying / Re: Manifold Pressure line for EIS, O-235
« on: January 24, 2011, 01:35:50 PM »
Hi Mike

Do you have an owner's manual?  I think you will find a reference to 2
ports on each cylinder.   I am using a O-320 and I think the O-235 is the
same for ports.  Look them over.

I use one port for MP (on cylinder #3) and one (on every cylinder) for
priming.   BTW: Use VERY good quality FLEXIBLE hoses for those lines.
Do NOT run the hoses directly from port to firewall; they need more support
than that.  And use the correct union fittings with silver soldier on the ports.
I have stainless steel braded teflon lined hoses for both MP and priming
(different sizes so they cannot be accidentally reversed).

Bruce Hughes   :)

21
Hangar Flying / Re: Gross weight question - long EZ
« on: January 14, 2011, 04:47:11 AM »
BTW  There are many experts in CA; I just know Bill and Dale.  If they are too busy, they
probably can refer you to a good person that can do inspections.   Just be D*MN sure
you get it inspected before you buy; A few years ago we had a VERY BAD example of a
canard owner trying to sell a pile of junk in southern CA.   The seller insisted on $1000
down and would not return it when it became so obvious that nobody would dare to fly
it.  The swindled guy had paid air fare from the east, too.

The only way to see what the minimum speed would be (as far as I know) is to get it to a
reasonable altitude and test it.

If you are planning to buy a Longeze that is already flying, your maximum weight has been set
by the builder.   You cannot, as far as I know, change that.   So you need to see what limit
he set.   

As you did not build it, you have a problem doing an annual inspection.  I think Bill Oertel or
Dale Martin can do that but you better ask one of them.   Ask your CSA state representative
or Joe Person or Dale Martin; any of them knows about 100 times as much as I do.

I am still trying to take a few pounds off of mine.   As I said, I can legally fly at 1400 lb.   When
the test period is finished the CG range opens somewhat.   That will allow me to take some tools
out of the nose so I will be around 1380 or I can carry more gas.    Sure I wish it was lighter
and I think I can get it down to 1360 lb.

Bruce Hughes    :)

22
Hangar Flying / Re: Gross weight question - long EZ
« on: January 13, 2011, 10:34:17 PM »
I missed the fact that you are searching for an airplane.   I thought you were planning to
build.  There is a big difference.  Heavy canards probably have too much epoxy per oz
of glass, which makes them weaker.  Being heavy AND weak is a double NO, NO.

I would NEVER consider BUYING a canard that is heavy; I am just stuck with one that I
MADE too heavy by using too much West System and putting a big engine and 3 blade
prop on.   I still can put a reasonable amount of gas and myself in it and fly at 1400 lb
so 1520 for the plane that crashed was too heavy.  The weight is NOT the reason that
they crashed; they did stupid flying at a high altitude that got one of them killed.

If you find a possible purchase, have Bill Oertel look at it, if it is in CA.   He is at Cheno airport.
If it is farther north, see if Dale Martin can look at it.   If it is in CO, Burrall Sanders can inspect
it.   Any of these 3 will charge a fee and it will be the best use of money you ever made.
They will not let you buy some cr*ppy, overweight airplane (like mine).   If it is somewhere
else, don't do anything until you find an expert (by asking us).   I only know of 5 people that
I would trust to look at it.

I still consider the Longeze safer than those aluminum things.   "show-off" flying is unsafe in
any airplane.

Bruce Hughes   :)

23
Hangar Flying / Re: Gross weight question - long EZ
« on: January 12, 2011, 09:23:46 PM »
I have been told to not say anything about canards as I am not an engineer and I do
not know what I am talking about.  Having said that, there are some obvious facts.

1. If built CORRECTLY, the canards are extremely strong.  Compare that to aluminum airplanes,
    either homebuilt or certificated.   The rear seat, in particular, is pretty safe.  I have a
    few parts from a Longeze that landed in a forest.  The pilot was killed but not the
    passenger.  Try that with an RV.
2. If your airplane turns out heavy, as mine is, you may have trouble getting the CG right.
    I have 25 pounds of tools in the nose and a battery that is bigger than necessary.
    Be careful to build correctly (I took over a project so maybe it is not all my fault).
    If you are a really big guy, the CG is easier to get right, even is the canard is a little
    heavy.
3.. If you have a forced landing, the energy to be stopped (by trees, rocks, whatever)
    is elated to the SQUARE of the landing speed.   If your canard was built too heavy,
    the landing speed will be higher.
4. If you are landing on a decent runway, just be sure you have good brakes.  Recently
    I discarded what I had and put Grove brakes on.  That is an important reason I feel
    fairly safe to fly it (if it ever flies)(I don't have FAA approval yet)
5. If you use a smaller engine and light propeller and are pretty heavy yourself, you might
    even have the CG too far farward.   Unlikely but you have to get the CG CORRECT.
6. You are the builder; you can legally set the maximum weight as whatever you want.
    You just need to pay attention to #1,2,3, and 4.
7. We don't have stall/spin accidents IF you get the CG right.
8. Look in the CSA directory; most builders give their empty weight.
9. Some builders have a light airplane but they are so heavy themselves that they will
    die of a heart attack or diabetes.   I can name names on that one.  I weight 160
    which is a little heavy for 5'7"
10. Did I say to be sure to get the CG right?

Bruce Nughes   :)

24
Hangar Flying / Re: What killed the Long EZ?
« on: January 12, 2011, 08:56:04 PM »
OK  We know where you are.....   When you get the CSA directory you can see who is
close by WITH A FLYING AIRPLANE.   Also look up Curt Smith (I forgot which state but
I think he is in S. Illinois).  He is a CFI and has a Cozy.  He will charge but it is a chance
to get some stick time.

A lot of people have built good airplanes a lot faster than I developed my project.  If
you learn how to do CORRECT fiberglass work, yours will be light enough.

I believe there is a state rep. for TN.   I don't have my newsletters as I am away from
home.  Look around page 20-24.

You might contact Valerie Harris.  I believe she is TN.  She and her husband have a
build/repair business so you could learn a lot from them.  She can show you some
really BAD composite work.   :(

Bruce Hughes   :)

25
Hangar Flying / Re: What killed the Long EZ?
« on: January 11, 2011, 09:57:33 PM »
Hi Cougar

The time required is a big factor.  Another is the possibility of making serious errors
that will haunt or kill you.  I have done over many, many things (which adds a little
weight each time).  You MUST have some expert help from other builders who know
what they are doing.   As so many pilots have a lot more experience with aluminum,
composite experts are not so abundant.   We can give you names, depending on'
where you live.   Which is ?

If properly built, the Longeze should be safer; the Longeze will take a lot of Gs.

DON'T make changes in the plans unless you are an aeronautical engineer.  I did that
and had to go back to the plan configuration every time.

Bruce Hughes   :)

26
Hangar Flying / Re: Gross weight question - long EZ
« on: January 11, 2011, 09:38:51 PM »
Hi (whatever your name is)

My Longeze (which has not flown) is heavier than that when full of people and gas.
I am still trying to take off a few pounds.
   
I will NOT be afraid to fly it but I will be D*MN sure that the CG is right.   That is
critical (and lighter would be nice)

Dick Rutan flew a Longeze which was much heavier than mine (with a huge gas tank
in the back seat)(to fly for a record).   I will NEVER fly any steep turns, especially at
such an altitude.

You probably do not know that we lost one pilot (I cannot spell his name but it was
something like Fessington) flying steep turns at an air show.

Those guys were hotdogging.  We need such people to get out of flying into car or
boat racing.

Bruce Hughes    :)

27
Hangar Flying / Re: Varieze Wing Attach
« on: January 06, 2011, 03:38:13 AM »
To Farnswow (it would be nice if we knew your name...)

Joe Person did not say the following but I know that it is true: 

Joe is one of Boeing's experts on metals.  After work he has
built 2 Variezes.   He is a superb craftsman.  I would listen to
what he is saying.   It is NOT a good idea to make changes
in RAF plans.

I have made a few mods to the RAF plans.  I have changed
almost all of them back to the way it was designed.   :(

Bruce Hughes    :)

28
Hangar Flying / Re: Alternator help
« on: December 28, 2010, 08:01:50 PM »
Judging from the very small picture, you have a very serious problem with belt
alignment.   Where are you on Maui?  For how long?  please call me at 250-0939

Bruce Hughes :)
On Maui (I know that because I am paying $3.95.9/gallon >:( for auto gas.....) >:(

29
Hangar Flying / Re: LongEZ or Cozy in Florida?
« on: December 26, 2010, 09:38:03 PM »
Hi John

I do not have a flying canard so be careful how much of this you believe.

The best thing for you is to join the CSA.  It is $30.  For that you will get 4 newsletters
and a directory.  When you get the directory, look under FL and you will see who is
close to you.   When you look through the Jan. issue, you will find the state representatives
around page 20.   Then start calling or emailing.   Talk with some real experts, not me.  You
probably will also buy some back issues, I did.

BTW If you plan to have your wife along, she will want more room for stuff than the
Varieze has.  If you want to fly faster and go solo, then the Varieze is better.   

If you start from plans and glass, you can buy plans for the Cozy.   Sometimes you can
buy plans for the Longese or Varieze but they are rare on Barnstormers.  Beware of Ebay;
(or Barnstormers) they may be xerox copies which really are not legal.   Maybe you
don't care.

Be careful about buying; you might get a Longeze like mine (way too heavy).   I had 2
or 3 dangerous things that I accidently created.  Those have been fixed on mine (as far
as I know) but if you buy, how do you know if it is not dangerous?

Bruce Hughes   :)

30
Hangar Flying / Re: Help with Long EZ vs. Vari EZ purchase decision.
« on: January 04, 2010, 01:52:49 PM »
Hi Paul

You are welcome.   BTW there is a way to avoid the leaks that the GU canard people
have.   The "fix" was published in the CSA newsletter (in 2008?)    Anyway it is easy
to find the article; I am just not at home right now.

You have joined the CSA, I hope.   There is an annual index of the articles for that
year.   You also can get back issues (I think they are the same price as current).

Paul, when you find a good project BE SURE THAT YOU HAVE A QUALIFIED  PERSON
TO CHECK IT OUT!   Of course you will need to pay for that service.  The person will
depend on where the airplane.   There must be a lot of qualified people but the
following are the people that I know to be VERY knowledgable:
Dale Martin - Idaho
Ken Miller - New York
Burrall Sanders - Colorado
Bill Oertel - S. California
Valerie Harris - Tennessee
Other people on this website can list other A & P canard support people that I don't know.
The CSA directory has their email and phone numbers except for Miller and Sanders.
Those 2 have their own websites but you may have to google up the names (or
see THIS website; I think both are listed).

I made a lot of mistakes which had to be corrected;  That, of course, adds weight.
And I got too much fill on the outer surface.   However I THINK it was ALREADY too
heavy when I bought the project.   You should insist on getting an accurate weight
with aircraft scales BEFORE the $ changes hands.   The club at Thun Field (Pierce County)
has superb scales.

Bruce Hughes   :)

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 14