Flying Simple

Author Topic: Flying Simple  (Read 3652 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Bill James

  • Moderator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 208
    • View Profile
Flying Simple
« on: November 02, 2011, 10:30:14 PM »
Could I have done everything I have done over the years with the VariEze… without an alternator?
     You can’t help but appreciate the talent, effort and accomplishments of those with the show quality complex planes, but I am not talking about that. I’m just looking at what I could have done to the VariEze versus what I have done.
     I’ve been flying the VariEze for about 15 years and a thousand hours and landings. Currently there is more than the normal amount of simple satisfaction (and often relief) flying an operationally simple airplane.
     It used to be even simpler than it is now. It flew four years without an alternator, just the two mags and a handheld radio and GPS, and a small battery for priming. During that simple era I went to the RACEs, flew non-stop 1400 miles to Reno, visited family in several states, essentially going everywhere I wanted to go.  Every time I pulled the plane out of the hangar it started and we went flying.
     My first RACE was Kanab, where I came in third… in a class of three. When I crossed the finish line the first and second place pilots - Klaus and Hertzler, had landed and were already sitting in lawn chairs drinking a soda.  If i had just had that alternator!!!     Not many people know this but one year I won my heat at Wendover, flying a perfect course and using perfect technique. Of course I was the only one running the course at Wendover that Friday, on my way to race at Jackpot the next day  :)  
     All with no electrical system.
     For a decade now the VariEze has had a small B&C alternator and panel mounted com and transponder. I added the alternator primarily for the extra pizzazz of electronic ignition, especially that ten percent increase in range. The transponder is a very practical addition, enabling cruise above 10K. There is a turn and bank indicator. Other than the alternator, most of the gizmo additions are excellent treasures from friends that decided to clear off their parts bench.
     Now I am looking at some simple autopilot capability. They say the alternator won’t even notice it   :)  Funny, while I am thrilled at the prospect of having some help with heading and maybe even the altitude at some point, most of the comments from friends and tech reps have to do with how much I am losing if I don’t add this or that other “little” gizmo. It’s great fun and I love the learning curve, and have even succumbed to the extravagance of a factory made bracket or two.  
    
     Back to the point, the plane flew great with no electrical. Looking back over the fifteen years, objectively, I think I could have probably done everything I have done with just the two mags   :)


« Last Edit: November 02, 2011, 10:42:04 PM by Bill James »
Bill James, Fort Worth VariEze N95BJ
Downdraft Plenums, QuickCowls
There was supposed to be anhedral?
ATP, Society of Flight Test Engineers

Offline av-mech

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 98
  • Leave nothing to chance
    • View Profile
Re: Flying Simple
« Reply #1 on: November 03, 2011, 07:24:57 AM »
Bill,

Love your post, you always write with such clarity that your point is hard to miss.  Despite being of the computer/gadge age(41) I am carefully condsidering ways of further simplicating my VE.  I do currently have a starter but it's already planned for removal.  The two things that have stopped that from happening is that I did not have a parking brake installed (which I now have but not installed yet) and the other is that my mags are old and a bit worn out.  I pulled the engine right off my old 150, no modifications and slapped it on the VE, sans alternator.  So although I have hand propped it several times, it's not currently always easy to do.  I have no desire to run electronic ignition (although I like its potential benefits) so an alternator is simply not needed.  A lighter aircraft is a better aircraft, no way to argue that point.  A simpler aircraft is a better aircraft, might be several aurgments for that.  As soon as I can spend the money on overhauled mags, starter will gather dust on shelf.

I have calculated that removing everything related to having the starter will reduce my empty weight by 22 lbs, somthing like 3.2% of my current empty weight.  On 66 sqft of wing area, that's not peanuts!!
Arnold Holmes
N80SH
IA 2712249
EAA 519850
TC#4476
Av-Mech.com

Offline N75EZ

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
    • View Profile
    • Pics
Re: Flying Simple
« Reply #2 on: November 03, 2011, 08:50:24 AM »
I'm with you guys, lighter is better.  I've owned Varieze N139JB since March, 2011 (changed to N75EZ) and I have taken 25lbs of weight out of it.  10lbs alone in reducing the original 22lb 22AH battery to a 12lb 18AH battery.  Most recently I removed the key switch (replaced with two toggles) and the starter solenoid that was doing nothing, since it has no starter.  I would like to remove the 13 different instruments/items in my panel and replace them with 3 items, a 4" MGL eXtreme EFIS/EMS, the MGL 2-1/4" COM radio and MGL's future 2-1/4" Xpdr. 

The single PMag (self powered) I added 80 flt hrs ago has been flawless so far.

My recent W&B says I still have a way to go; N75EZ is still overweight, but I'm working on it.  Adding rollover protection (weight) seems prudent however.

Offline Bill James

  • Moderator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 208
    • View Profile
Re: Flying Simple
« Reply #3 on: November 10, 2011, 09:26:11 PM »
Having your cake and eating it too    
Tuesday morning broke in Fort Worth with multiple frontal systems sweeping swiftly across Texas. I needed to be 300 miles south that afternoon for a family business meeting. These fast moving weather systems often pass through and then regenerate and come again. This system did that a couple of times. With the bad Wx it looked like instead of flying the VariEze for an enjoyable hour and a half, I’d be driving for six hectic hours on I-35 with 200,000 of my closest friends.
     Getting ready to start the drive, the system moved east and the skies cleared and glowed a beautiful welcoming blue. Ha.  
     I got to spend several enjoyable hours around the house, including getting a couple of extra little things done on the plane. Not as exciting as jousting on I-35, thank goodness.
     Two hours before my meeting I saddled up and lifted off. My usual headwind was in attendance, but I exhilarated anyway in the crazy freedom of, well, having my cake and eating it too.
     I have always figured I had driven the trip “home” a few dozen times. But if I have averaged five trips a year, that is now over 150 trips, on the low end. Although I have made the flight down there and back dozens of times, flying always makes it a special time. In the 1980s the trip was made in a Cessna-120. And now the Eze!
     Did I mention the 30 Kt headwind? Both ways. And that the Cessna-120 used about 6 gph doing 90 mph indicated, which today would have been 50 mph ground speed? While I averaged 5 gph at three times the speed for the trip in the Eze?
     Heading across Texas is always better by airplane. Leaning into a nostalgic mood, I wouldn’t mind having Glen Campbell and some mild AM radio static playing in the background, as when I drove this desolate span to summer work as a teenager. But now my favorite music is a la Lycoming.
     Several times I have tried to imagine how the trip will be different with an autopilot, but realize that now I can still go long enough without working the sidestick to refold maps every few minutes   :)  - and handle the cockpit chores fine without the added complexity of the autopilot.
     I know!   - I’ll rationalize with the “safety” excuse.   :)
     Today on the return trip, I’m sitting up there in my front row seat, skimming just above the turbulence, occasionally circling over the hills and lakes and magnificent homes out in the middle of nowhere, nice long unmarked runways nestled in along ridgelines or in the nook of a river, amazed at God's handiwork; thinking that this is the perfect way to spend a Tuesday and Wednesday. Gotta figure out how to do that all the time…
     The landing at home was sporty. A low-speed high-pass provided an idea what the runway turbulence environment was like, and the approach was made with “anticipation.”  All good.  Great fun.
     I often hear remarks about how some person probably spent more time building than they will ever spend flying in the plane. I can honestly say that the first flight alone in my plane totally satisfied the equation for me. Paid. Done. The succeeding fifteen years are all gravy. Or icing!   :)
          I guess the phrase “You can’t have your cake and eat it too” emphasizes that you can either have the visual enjoyment of the cake - or the pleasure and enjoyment (and nutrition?) that the cake would provide if eaten, once; but you can have both.
     Thank goodness the airplane gives you both.  
     And without the company of 200,000 of your closest friends  :)

     Bill
« Last Edit: November 10, 2011, 10:00:52 PM by Bill James »
Bill James, Fort Worth VariEze N95BJ
Downdraft Plenums, QuickCowls
There was supposed to be anhedral?
ATP, Society of Flight Test Engineers

Offline N75EZ

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
    • View Profile
    • Pics
Re: Flying Simple
« Reply #4 on: November 10, 2011, 11:03:15 PM »
Like