Show Posts - flyoz

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - flyoz

Pages: [1] 2
1
Hangar Flying / Re: Varieze Wing Attach
« on: February 13, 2011, 03:02:30 PM »
Thanks for the advice

The brackets themselves are not unduly complicated but attention to detail like lapping the taper pins for good fit will be important

Flyoz


2
Hangar Flying / Re: Varieze Wing Attach
« on: February 11, 2011, 01:40:34 AM »
Looking at the Wing attach
Why are the lower taper pins threaded ? Just for ease of assembly ?
The nut is just for safety ? How much torque do they need ?
Looks like it could lead to a possible mistake when attaching ie too much load on the bolt  , and no load on nut ?
I assume the taper pin thread was designed for that .
I have made drawings from the printed plans but have no definative dimensions - were any given out for the builder to use or was it required to buy them from Brock  ?
Lots of questions i suppose
Flyoz

3
Hangar Flying / Re: Varieze Wing Attach
« on: February 06, 2011, 02:54:52 PM »
Windy
I would be interested in a set of standard 2024-T3 fittings as suggested in this tread
Flyoz

4
Hangar Flying / Re: Rudder lift and Drag
« on: October 29, 2010, 12:36:28 AM »
OK makes sense .
Just looking at the concept - if the rudder deflected inwards it would still add drag and reduce the lift at the tip - same effect but maybe it was too much
Anyway i am not trying to redesign or change anything - just saying what if
Flyoz ;D

5
Hangar Flying / Rudder lift and Drag
« on: October 28, 2010, 01:50:45 AM »
My path of reading CP's and testing my rudder cutting templates on some scrap foam continue , more blue dust maybe one day ......
My real question
The winglets ( rudders ) try to lift the tip in flight , so in my mind deflecting the rudder should increase that lift and try to lift the tip even more than the other wing and this then has
to be overcome by up deflection of the aileron on the same wing - sort of cancels out the effect . The only thing i can suspect is that the rudder deflection produces more drag and
the wing is dragged in that direction hence the turn .
I know the aircraft turns well so what is the turning theory with winglet rudders ?
Flyoz

6
Hangar Flying / Longeze landing - lessons for us all
« on: August 13, 2010, 04:01:16 PM »
You may have sen this video clip on youtube of a longeze landing at Emmen   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNaMlG_Bbxo
Its instuctional and shows how easy it is to get distracted even for the most experienced
Here is my take on what happpened
Set up for a great landing , landing brake down -but no nosewheel down .
Pilot realises nosewheel not down and starts winding it down -stops and then retracts landing brake - looses concentration on flying properly ( sec 17 )
20 starts to get nosewheel down
27 looks like going around but landing brake starts coming out again
28 - landing brake down and nose starts pitching up ( loosing airspeed ? )
29 canard stalls and bellyflops
The aircraft remains largly intact which is lucky for the pilot
It easy to get distracted in these crucial phases of flying and landing - something all of us can learn from this
Flyoz

7
For Sale/Wanted / Re: Plans for Varieze
« on: July 19, 2010, 03:01:26 PM »
Thanks Joe
I will speak to you on the " my messages " part of this forum
Flyoz

8
For Sale/Wanted / Re: Plans for Varieze
« on: July 17, 2010, 02:59:57 PM »
Some questions
Are they unused ?
Do they contain all the template drawings ?
Are they still for sale ?
Flyoz

9
Sorry Bill
The question was two fold i suppose
Thanks - so your winglets are built as the manual 90 Deg to the upper surface of the wing and used all the standard templates on Page A8
My following question is to yourself and anyone else - does anyone have a copy  of page A8 and those templates even if they are not to scale ?
Flyoz

10
From the Varieze manual the winglet trailing edge  "cant "angle is 90 Deg to the upper wing surface - i assume if you remove the anhederal that "cant " angle remains 90 deg ?
The lower winglet section template has a line on it - is that set parallel to the fuselage centerline ? I know there is a template for setting that .
I dont have Page A8 as called for in the manual and that has all the winglet templates - anyone have a copy of that page ?
Flyoz

11
Fair comment
I have read quite a few and looked at the plans - but not all ( its a continuous journey ! )
I suppose i was trying to see what other alternatives had been tried ( non RAF )
The incedent reports seem to suggest a higher number of failures because
The header tank was selected on start and left on or not used on long decents 
Flyoz

12
More questions please
If you set the main wing up 1 deg do you do the same to the strakes (which seem from the plans to be symmetrical) ?
The fuel from the wings run into a sump tank under the passenger seat and i assume it has to have a boost pump for starting or long decents
because at those times the carb is lower than the tank - what about the possibility of the sump tank behind the back rest of the passenger seat
It would not be as low as the sump tank under the passengers legs ? its slightly ahead ( C of G )  of the header tank as the original plans depict ?
Thanks
Flyoz

13
Thanks Bill for the clarification your help appreciated
So as i understand it . Build the wings and centerspar as one unit  as close to the original templates as possible .Use entended templates and waterlevel and string system to set up the whole unit to the standard plans( but zero anhedral ) . This is where maximum accuracy is required. Then  the whole unit is is adjusted up 1 deg when it is fitted to the fuselage . Makes a lot of sense.
I have seen a system of templates where the original hot wire cut is made just slightly oversize and then the correct size templates fitted and sanded back to those  for increased accuracy . That could be done when the wings / mainspar is one unit for final accuracy .
Flyoz

14
I have used the original templates drawings for the scans . I then printed my CAD files ( from those scans )  and placed the printed CAD file onto the original templates and they were accurate to the original templates so i beleive its as accurate as i will get them but the original templates had no measurements on them so i will have to rely on those original templates for size ( as many others must have ) .
Wing incedence - As i understand it the template waterlines are adjusted up 1 deg to increase the AOA and i am going to assume thats at the wing root attach center . Then all the other template waterlines are adjusted and checked back to the string line as you suggest . Extending the templates for accuracy makes good sense . I assume the wing tips will also rotate back 1 deg as well ?
Thanks for all  the feedback
Flyoz

15
Wing incedence and accuracy
I have been looking at the accuracy of the original wing root section . When  scanned from the original drawing templates
there are small inaccuracies - it must have been the original printing , also the root is printed in three sections on different sheets
I have read this very good article -  http://v2.ez.org/feature/F0502-1/F0502-1.htm ( thanks Bill ) .
You talk about changing the incedence to that of the Long Ez . The Original Varieze wing section is a modified GA(W)-1
and the templates only have the the waterline on them . The same is true for the long Ez templates - how do you modify the incedence ?
I have looked at the original GA(W)-1 ordinates to get the "zero " line but it is slightly different to the Varieze GA(W)-1 ( modified )
Flyoz

Pages: [1] 2