Show Posts - GlennBob

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - GlennBob

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 18
76
Hangar Flying / Re: Fuel vent
« on: September 09, 2010, 10:35:38 PM »
Now William, . . .that was a beautiful description of a wild goose chase ! !   Only this time, . .I think the goose got away ! !   Maybe we could get some GPS coordinates to locate the change in direction of the vent lines. (Just ribbin' ya buddy! !)  That's first, . .second, . .doesn't the gear leg exit the fuselage about a foot below the strake ?  If so, . .how could this be an insignificant drag area ?   I've heard stories of the vent line peeing on the passenger seat when parked, . .so I moved mine to the outboard area  about even with the GIB's ears. (On the side of the area directly behind the canopy).  My concern is that I've also heard about lack of vent pressure and engine ceasing as a result.  (That's not a very comforting sound).  I think that venting below the strake is a great idea, but I'm not sure about the path getting there and also the exact (gps) location of the point of penentration.   Venting below sounds like a great idea, so that peeing is not a problem. My wife had the cats in the car and on a hot day, . .it's intoxicating ! ! - side's that, . . I don't like it ! !   Come to think of it (venting that is )  Cessna has it's vents below the wing near the strut attach point too.  Did they get that from you ?   ;D

77
For Sale/Wanted / Re: Prop extension
« on: September 08, 2010, 11:29:17 PM »
The prop extension is a 6 inch extension.  Sae 1 bolt pattern.  The width of the prop extension is 5 1/2 inches.  I got a couple pics if you'd like to see them.  Email me @  ezskyboy@frontier.com   

78
For Sale/Wanted / Prop extension
« on: August 23, 2010, 09:44:39 PM »
Hey, . . Anybody got a 6 "  prop extension for the O-320 ?  Sae 2 ?  I need one.   And I have one for the O-235 for sale ! !

Glennbob

79
Hangar Flying / Re: New FaceBook Group for Canardians
« on: August 20, 2010, 11:42:12 PM »
I guess we'll see which one settles out on top ! !

80
For Sale/Wanted / Re: Flywheel O-320-E2A
« on: August 17, 2010, 10:48:43 PM »
Found one ! !     It was on my  O-235  ! ! !  =  )

81
For Sale/Wanted / Flywheel O-320-E2A
« on: August 16, 2010, 12:36:43 AM »
Looking for a used  flywheel for an O-320-E2A Lycoming.  Prefer 122 teeth.

920 - 946 - 4756

Glennbob

82
Hangar Flying / Re: Longeze landing - lessons for us all
« on: August 15, 2010, 10:47:30 PM »
Looks pretty cool on the ground though, . .if he could change to retractable gear,  now might be a good time to do it !   Did you see the gear leg go flying when he hit ?  Major bummer ! !

83
For Sale/Wanted / Re: The well tested O-235
« on: August 12, 2010, 11:45:38 PM »
Hey  Great  info guys ! !    I'm just dying to get some air time in this thing, .  so . . I think we're gonna go with the O-235.  However, . .I should point out that I don't have a stock  O-235-L2C.  Mine has the high compress. pistons. 9.5 : 1,  and you can sure tell.  It cranks over quite hard.  So,  I have a few ponies added there,  plus now I have 4 single exhaust pipes rather than the 2 into 1 and I also have the Ellison T.B. and dual lightspeed ignition.  So . I think I'm creeping near the HP of the stock O-320.  (150hp).

We'll try this one now (235) and then later put in the 320 and find out we did all that conversion work for 10 extra knots ! !

GM


84
Hangar Flying / Re: O-320 Engine Mount
« on: August 12, 2010, 11:28:59 PM »
Yeah  he offered to do it for me too, . .  $ 200.00 plus shipping.   But it appears now that I am going to stay with the O-235 for the moment.  I'd like to get some bug guts (as Bill James says)  on my bird ! !

D. Swenson says that the cozy girls have the info on their site as well.

Glennbob

85
For Sale/Wanted / Re: The well tested O-235
« on: August 12, 2010, 06:35:04 PM »
Thanks Steve  for the  other considerations regarding the O-320 engine.

I guess I'd be surprised if the additional equipment for the O-320 would add up to 100#'s.  Gary H. told me I could use the same prop extension, . .just re-machine the bolt holes for the wider pattern.  I have dual batteries in the nose now, so I don't think that would change.   I do agree that the center of gravity might move aft, but I was thinking of extending the nose a bit and move the batteries a touch forward to compensate.  See, . .there's a bunch more work to this thing.   So . .at the moment, .I'm leaning back to the O-235.   Gary H also told me that if I want to fly in this lifetime, . .(grin), ..I'd better stick with this engine, - a sentiment echoed by Terry S.   

Thanks again for your input ! !   I appreciate it ! 

Glennbob

86
Hangar Flying / Re: Vortex Generators on Canard Aircraft
« on: August 11, 2010, 12:48:02 AM »
I met a guy at The Show (OSH)  who had a newer Velocity with VG's and some were coming off.  I asked him about it and he said he was in the process of taking them off.  He didn't feel they were worth the trouble and the top end penalty.  That was his 2 Cents.  He had a nice bird.   One door only on his Velocity.  Said it made his cabin 8" wider !  And eliminated a large portion of the center counsel rib.

Glennbob

87
Hangar Flying / O-320 Engine Mount
« on: August 11, 2010, 12:45:11 AM »
I have an O-235 L2C  that I'm planning to swap out with an  O-320.   I've heard the motor mount needs to be stregthened with gussets to help support the extra weight and torque.

Does anyone have any ideas where the gussets need to go ?  Or how many ?  Any drawings on this ?  I have the conical mount.

Thanks for the input.

Glennbob

88
For Sale/Wanted / Re: The well tested O-235
« on: August 11, 2010, 12:42:19 AM »
I don't have to consider the " Down time "  because I'm already there.  And frankly, . .I'm absolutely sick of it.  I bought this bird . .flying. . .(sort of) 5 years ago, . without paint and I needed to go through it.  Busy with work and other distractions, . .but now I'm getting close and I have both engines to choose from.  I know the O-320 will burn more fuel, but then I'm going faster so the total fuel for the trip really isn't much of a compromise.  They say it weighs more, .  . .yeah . .I think about 25 pounds.  That's 4 gallons of fuel ! !  Not enough of a diff for me.  So , . I have  to make some adjustments, but I don't think it's going to add much time to my final finish date.  So . .I'm leanin' towards the O-320.  Many things will transfer to the other engine, ,some will not.  But, . hey . .thanks for the come back ! !   Glennbob

89
For Sale/Wanted / The well tested O-235
« on: August 09, 2010, 10:28:32 PM »
 I'm seriously working at changing my EZ to accept an O-320 powerplant.  I've heard that it will shorten the runways, but mostly, . .improve top end speed.  I know there will be some increase in fuel burn,  but I think the trade off for the speed will be worth it.   There are a lot of modifications and exchanges necc. to make this happen, but I already have the engine and it's very low time. 

What is the scoop on this idea ?   The O-235 has 9.5:1  Pistons and dual lightspeed ignition and an Ellison TB.  Got the wheel pants and the ram air box.  Just wondering if I should go through the trouble if the little O-235 is really a good deal.   ? ? ?  Any feedback ?  Glennbob.

90
Hangar Flying / Re: Looking for Long Ez pilots in Wisconsin
« on: March 26, 2010, 09:45:27 PM »
I thought we crossed this bridge a while ago.   There are several  Longez pilots in Wisc.  Best way to find them is to contact CSA association.  Terry Schubert  should have all that info.

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 18