Show Posts - Bill James

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Bill James

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 14
91
For Sale/Wanted / Re: Nose gear parts needed
« on: August 02, 2011, 08:43:03 PM »
Ben
With the nose gear experience behind you, two questions:
- Is it absolutely necessary to remove the crank mechanism from in-between the NG-30 Bulkheads to switch the gear around?
- If there are several gear cogs still remaining at the extended area of the gear, can the gear be locked in the down position and flown home?
Oh, one more... any lessons learned that you can pass on  :)
Thanks-


92
Hangar Flying / Re: slime fighter
« on: July 18, 2011, 08:03:08 PM »
Very interesting guys. Always a better way to skin a cat.
      Yuck. Anybody ever done that? On purpose?
I continue to revere the CP exaltation that the case vent tube must be clear, therefore always using the clear hose rather than rubber or colored  :) 
I believe that once upon a time i probably caused a crank seal to seep before its time, so I appreciate the different details here.
                                                                             Here kitty-kitty.

93
Hangar Flying / Re: slime fighter
« on: July 17, 2011, 11:42:30 AM »
Very clean looking. (For the occasional visitor to the site here, you can only see the attached images if you are signed-in).
For fun, having used several Rube Goldberg apparatus’ -  a couple of questions.
What does it do? Slow down the airflow, catch the oil vapor, …you just install it and then something magic happens…?
We have all heard, to avoid blowing out the crank seal, that a case vent must retain the ¾ inch inside diameter. Is there a concern of back pressure?
Thanks for another detail to chase  :)

94
Hangar Flying / Re: Oshkosh 2011
« on: July 04, 2011, 09:54:02 AM »
He needs help getting to higher altitudes because of numerous 2000 foot msl ridgelines on his route to Oshkosh, or RR, or anywhere else.
One of his recent efforts was to add spoilers. He tried 2x4 and 2x6 pine studs on top of the wings but couldn't detect a difference in approach speed, cruise speed, or at any other speeds.
He is hoping that switching the current Model T wheel pants to the fenders off his Indian motorcycle will get him that last five knots, which will up his cruise speed 10%.
 

95
Hangar Flying / Re: N80SH back in the air!
« on: July 03, 2011, 09:30:17 PM »
Wow. Great stuff.

96
Hangar Flying / Re: Oshkosh 2011
« on: July 03, 2011, 09:24:56 PM »
I am again reporting for an Eze-driver friend. His internet is down for upgrade. You may remember that he was trying to get to Rough River last year and failed again. He says that he is trying to get to Oshkosh but is working on a last minute mod and still cant get the wheel pants just right. He hopes to meet with Burt and Richard Branson about some ideas he has on getting to higher altitudes. A picture of his plane is attached. I believe you have to be signed in to see it.
Bill James

97
Hangar Flying / Re: N80SH back in the air!
« on: July 01, 2011, 10:06:12 PM »
No rush Arnold, but when you catch your breath, please run through the things that were beneficial in preparing yourself. Or if you had already flown ezes, were there things you did back then to get ready for your first front seat or solo flight?
Congrats!
Bill James

98
For Sale/Wanted / Re: Nose gear parts needed!!!
« on: June 29, 2011, 09:02:44 AM »
Most of us never think about this non-metal gear, partly because it is well pretty-well designed for it's several purposes. While the gear extend/retract speed limitation is often scoffed at or ignored, doing so may be a reason that the gear sometimes fails for seemingly no apparent reason. Again, with the gear fully extended or retracted, the lever goes over-center against the mounting bolts, with no reliance on the gear itself. Fun to watch it work and go over-center.
Joe, I need more help understanding these airplanes, like for instance why do they sit on the nose like that. Maybe you could straighten me out over hot dogs at Oshkosh?

99
For Sale/Wanted / Re: Nose gear parts needed!!!
« on: June 27, 2011, 12:36:46 PM »
The gear disc is a designed failure point. There is no pressure/strain on the gear disc itself when fully extended or retracted, but rather the lever load is on one of the substantial mounting bolts. Allows fairly simple repair all things considered :)

100
For Sale/Wanted / Re: Nose gear parts needed!!!
« on: June 25, 2011, 06:46:54 PM »
If you have the Brock mechanism, the gear is not metal and usually strips on one side. If so, you can simply turn the gear to the opposite side.  "Simply" is a relative term  :)

101
Hangar Flying / Around the World
« on: June 18, 2011, 10:29:31 PM »
OK, going around the world, what constant, critical “value/ingredient/number/ element/factor/quality/quantity” did the Voyager maintain for 9 days?
...Altitude? No.
Heading? No.
Power setting? No.
Fuel Flow? No.
RPM? No
Temperature? No.
Pressure? No.

How about… AOA.
The way I remember it they started out with both motors at full power doing 132 kts, and ended up nine days later going 92 kts with the front motor shut down and the back motor at low power. I think those numbers are close.
Holding AOA was a key requirement for making the distance with the fuel available. Heavy, they held more speed. Lighter, they needed less power and speed to support the desired AOA. Just another thought on the relationships between weight and AOA.
I wonder if Steve Fawcett had the same focus? Surely.

Reminds me of the 4400 nm/33 hour LongEZ flight where a cable was used between the wheel axles to keep them from spreading under the load, but once airborne the cable was released and retracted because the drag was unacceptable.

102
Hangar Flying / Thoughts on Operating Weight
« on: June 14, 2011, 09:45:13 PM »
The note that I wrote on flight characteristics was pretty light and carefree. However, it wasn't done lightly. Ha. And that's the problem, weight matters :)
There was some pretty significant prep on me and the plane beforehand. These include personal training, practice, the annual inspection and things like the BFR. FWIW, Here are a few thoughts.
- My airplane’s minimum speed is higher at heavier weights. Sure. A no brainer, right? But how does that affect us?
I observed this while doing slow flight with a pretty solid GIB (Guy in Back). The airplane just would not go slower that 80 indicated. Not having thought about it that day, I expected the minimum speed to be about 55 or 60 indicated, as on the recent test flight. However, that flight was made with me and 8 gallons. This flight, besides me probably not holding my tongue right, included over twice that fuel, warmer temps, and a solid young adult in back.
To me there are two immediate issues in flying at higher gross weights.
One, its hard on the landing gear attachment area. How many of us imagine compensating for higher operating weight by simply just always making feather soft landings? And then do it every time? Ha.
Two, another bad thing, in a forced landing at higher weights the ground speed and inertia are higher. We are just more at risk to damage and injury and a more sporty arrival when we just can’t slow down to the aircraft’s optimum touchdown speed. Any airplane.

BTW, I didn’t do slow flight without preparation. It is not part of our normal flight operations. Rather, it must be done very carefully and deliberately with every airplane during the restricted period, after purchase, or after a mod like final paint, to confirm that when we are in normal flight, that if for some reason we do get unusually slow, that the plane will in fact operate as designed and protect us. Follow the POH and CPs in accomplishing that minimum speed test operation. You don't just go out there and go to full back stick the first time. Do the homework  :)

I would not have done slow flight with the passenger if I hadn’t recently tested my plane and confirmed proper handling at full back stick. Because of time I chose not to demo aileron or rudder turns at minimum speed with him, although I had recently done them solo.  
Also, I backed him up on the sidestick so he wouldn’t do anything unexpected and force the plane out of controlled flight, and so I could make immediate inputs if needed.
So those are a few of my thoughts on the plane insisting on a higher minimum speed than I desired.

A couple more general thoughts. A bush pilot had an angle of attack indicator on his wing strut, with best AOA marked in red. Using that he could always climb out, or approach, at the best angle, which was always the same AOA, regardless of weight. But the speed varied greatly.
He also noted that the airplane always stalled at the same AOA, but the stall speed varied greatly between high and low weights.
Same for us. Our approach AOA can be the same, but higher weights will always have higher speeds at that particular angle, no matter whether we hold our tongue right or not. And for us, our speed at max lift/min speed may be much higher than we expect or want. And remember, in an emergency landing, to arrest the rate of descent, we need to maintain at least 22 mph over that minimum speed until flaring.

As with any airplane, use extreme caution when doing things that you haven’t done in awhile. An example was a new private pilot in a C-172 with his girlfriend that somehow ended up doing multiple circles at 60 degrees bank at 400 feet over his parent’s house. - Not something the instructor had done with him a lot in training.  

Another thought, here on a hot day the air on the 700 foot msl runway may be at over 4000 feet density altitude. It is prudent to follow the mountain flying practice on takeoff before releasing brakes of going to full throttle and then lean to peak.

Another?
- Operating an airplane at gross or over-gross weights will probably result in at least minor damage to the landing gear attachments.

Another?…
Concerning building a light aircraft. I have heard and felt others say, and have caught myself thinking, “My airplane will be the lightest one ever built, and the fastest, because… because… I really care.
Ha.

I know we all know this stuff. Thanks for coming along anyway.

Oh yes, one more thing. You do remember the one "constant" that they maintained on the Voyager all nine days, right?

103
Hangar Flying / Cessna, Give Way to Experimental Jet
« on: June 13, 2011, 07:42:32 PM »
Had I been writing a flight report on the venerable VariEze, part of it would have gone something like this:
At the busy airport the VariEze garnered a lot of attention from transients, ferry pilots, and locals alike.
Almost reverently, the line boy voiced the secret code, “Can I have a ride?” He had been hustling around helping me saddle up, with just the right level of knowledge and enthusiasm for the Eze brand. And his eyes had that telling glow. He had earned the magic words, “Hop in.”
Talking through the takeoff indications we accelerated to 160 mph indicated. I mentioned that at this point over the end of the runway we had enough energy to circle back and land on the runway without power if needed. We lofted into a gentle climb to the west and I told the tower we would be back in about ten minutes.
Trimmed and climbing out at 180 mph I announced, “You have the airplane” and raised my hands for him to see that I wasn’t on the controls.  He jostled the airplane a bit and then quickly settled down. For the rest of the flight I could hear him reacting in excitement, surprise, and appreciation at the responsiveness of the controls and the minimal input needed to maneuver gracefully.
After a minute of getting used to the plane we tried some turns, first without rudders, then with. He established a 30 degree bank to the right, and then turned left to a 30 left degree bank to the other side. I told him that with no rudder input the airplane would hesitate in the middle of the turn, and it did.
I stated that the VariEze is a rudder airplane, but successfully resisted giving him the whole bale of hay background and history on the early flights and how the first two VariEzes were flown around happily with no ailerons, using elevons on the canard, and rudder. Or how they loaded a wing to 18 Gs… and there was that picture with eleven people standing on a canard….

Instead, we continued on with the rest of our story on VariEze turns, this time with rudder.
Wings level, I instructed him to bank right to 30 degrees, mentioning that I would now be assisting with a little rudder. He nudged the stick to the right and I gently put in an inch of rudder for a second and gently released it. The plane zipped to 30 degrees right! As expected he lit up the intercom with almost gleeful noises. Fun. We held that right bank a few seconds.  Then I talked him through the left bank back to the other side and said go.  Again my gentle one-inch left rudder input lasted only a second or two. Without hesitation we arrived at the left 30 degree bank, almost instantly. Again, excited noises on the intercom. Like many things, you have to be there doing it to appreciate it.
Then, I had him hold the sidestick neutral, while I made the turns using rudders only. With my hands up and visible we banked to the right, then to the left, and back to level, using rudders only.

Next I took control of the plane and did several wingovers, describing as we lofted over the top that in addition to what he was experiencing now, how the green and blue and bronze surrounds you and reflects in the canopy so beautifully while doing these on my sunset runs.
Next, slow fight. I gradually reduced power to about 1400 rpm while he held the wings level and the nose slightly up. I called out the decreasing airspeeds as he slowed down, and backed him up on the sidestick. With the nose up high at about 80 indicated we were flying level with the stick full aft. I asked him to go ahead and try to pull the nose up further and “stall” the airplane. He said the stick was already full back. I said that, to my reasoning, we were not at a stall, but rather the canard was at maximum lift.  Big difference. I reduced the power a little more and we gently descended. Then I added power and we climbed like a scalded elevator. All with the stick full aft.

We nosed over and banked back toward the airport. Once we were in level cruise I announced that we would do one more little historic demo for him, where he would hold the stick/ailerons neutral while I put in right rudder for a couple of seconds. The plane went nose low and rolled rapidly toward vertical. I recovered the plane before reaching aerobatic angles but it was obvious that we would have soon been diving straight down. I mentioned the sage advice: the first step of any emergency – Fly the Airplane.

Returning to drop him off, the GIB had been silent for a moment. He said, “I can tell you fly this airplane a lot. And that you really enjoy it.” I thought “Bingo!” but remained silent, letting him have the last word. I thought about how “gently efficient” is a very good term to describe the pilotage of those around me that have evolved over time into seasoned VariEze drivers. And how “elegantly efficient” is a good description of the VariEze.

I thought we were past the last of the excitement for the flight but during the approach the GIB seemed to enjoy the talk through the landing philosophy and aero braking rollout as much as anything. I mentioned that with the nose-high rollouts I used the brakes sparingly and that the pads had not needed to be replaced for the past several annuals.
I realized that during all this I had regressed a little from my “serious pilot” mindset and was having as much fun as he was.

After rollout and exiting the runway we were taxiing on Alpha, back to the other end to drop him off. I don’t know if the tower guys may have been able to see us when we were playing out west, but they were in a good mood and giving us special handling. Again, I thought we were past the best part of the flight…  
As we taxied north, a Caravan had landed and was exiting mid-runway angled in conflict with us. The tower controller said, “Cessna, hold short of Alpha and give way to the Experimental Jet…”  
Ha! We both about lost it. I looked in the mirror and the GIB was hollering and pumping his fists in the air. We both felt like we had been kinda flying a jet and the Tower's subliminal comment fit right in and confirmed the feeling. Great fun.

I think the kid and I kinda bonded.

Design Revolution or Dead End?  
Again, Ha.

104
Hangar Flying / Re: Air oil separator.
« on: June 07, 2011, 10:54:41 PM »
The VariEze 0-290’s initial propensity for spewing oil vapor was calmed by repositioning the case breather outlet to a welded fitting in the mag hole cover plate. I had been warned of significant wet vapor expulsion from the stock case vent by the prop flange and they were right. But now the oil laden vapor loses some energy coming up into the accessory case before coming out the upward directed 90 in the mag hole cover plate. From there the exit hose crosses over the accessory case into a custom air/oil separator at the upper firewall, then aft under the pushrod tubes to the aft cowl opening.
The air/oil separator is made from an aluminum automotive air conditioner “dryer” I believe it's called, one of dozens discarded in the corner of a friend’s a/c shop. I cut it open and cleaned it out and fitted it with a middle baffle plate and some stainless steel mesh. If I had known exactly where I was going to mount it on the upper firewall I would have shaped it slightly differently. It already had one ¾ inch tube outlet at a good location and another was welded on for the breather hoses.
Another smaller tube is welded on the bottom corner of the separator with a gravity-return tube for the condensed oil. While the tube should be suspect of several irrational design flaws, including the fact that it would have equal and opposite pressure on both ends during engine operation, it has none of the negatives that I expected, and works splendidly probably due to an overall bow to gravity. The return fitting for this drain/return tube into the case is just above the case/sump joint where it does not spew diabolical green alien acid on the cam. I appreciate that concern and have taken defensive steps but have noticed several other things to actively pursue and defend against, like not running out of fuel or into the ground, and just let this contraption do what it does so well with a cleaner and dryer aircraft posterior. It is free flowing and retains the same diameter of the standard case vent through the entire length of the tubing and separator. The “clear” tubing adheres to the strict direction in the plans  :)
This air/oil separator is robust and could (and has been) mounted in many different locations. It was especially useful during the early engine operation, although the oil vapor floating around the aft end of the plane in flight revealed many things about how air does and doesn’t follow the rules back there. Very interesting and enjoyable, especially once I got to where I could control the blowby. And now there is no reason to remove it  :)
A side note -  early on, breaking in the steel cylinders and chrome rings, a sage A&P that helps with engine stuff every annual stated/suggested that everything else being equal, the rings and cylinders would seat and the blowby would calm down on its own at about 100 hours. He was exactly right.

105
Hangar Flying / Re: Crummy Review
« on: June 01, 2011, 09:22:24 PM »
"....I often read (the CPs) a bit like a novel."
Steve, you hit my head on the nail  :)!  This is the un-thought thought that I have wished for so many folks –that they could read the CPs and see that they are more than just another stack of pesky boring technical unpleasantries that old fogies try to push on new enthusiasts just for the sake of it–
Where you can mentally work your way up through the high-jinks and low-jinks with the pioneers, moving through elevons and spoilers and widened elevators and shortened canards and ailerons and belly boards and the many significant growth spurts that the VariEze flailed through in a couple of short years - where the non-fiction account reveals the many intricate nuances of the design – and maybe after living through the early days it becomes part of your story and after which so many “great ideas” would come into the simple light of day (harsh reality) and fall of their own weight…  Ha. Weight. That’s a good one  :)  
Maybe the CPs can also be of use or interest for the new owner or builder that gets the plane up and flying and then sits back in an easy chair –Ha- to recount the history of his/her steed, to appreciate the experience even more.
I bought the VariEze plans on day one and got license #619. My CP subscription started immediately and i got the earlier ones too and read and re-read them all, as well as anything else written on the plane, as part of the elite group of left-outers, for 15 years. So the CPs were kind of a life-line. In perfect timing I finally got going and am about to catch up soon  :)
So enough about the CPs. You said a lot of other interesting things for us folks to chew on and should probably go on for a bit. Please keep notes on your thoughts even if you don't post them immediately.
Congrats again-

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 14